3.3 KiB
Task 2 Report: Safe and Audit Backend Rename
Status
Task 2 is complete for the backend. The model exports, ORM table names, resource
contracts, protected routes, approval workflow, dashboard query, and focused SQL
tests now use the safe_* and audit_* names exclusively. No frontend
resources, routes, or pages were changed.
TDD Evidence
The existing Task 1 route and resource-contract tests provided the initial RED
baseline. Before production changes, the backend focused suite failed because
the safe_* and audit_* contracts/routes were missing while the legacy
saf_* and aud_* routes remained registered.
The backend behavior tests were then updated first for the renamed model API,
tables, request paths, and disposal relation. Running the focused suite again
failed as expected with models.SafeRule undefined, in addition to the route
contract failures. This confirmed the tests required the production rename.
After the minimal production implementation, the focused suite turned GREEN:
$env:GIN_MODE='release'
go test ./internal/logic/platform ./internal/routers -run 'Test.*(Safe|Audit)' -v
Result: exit code 0. All selected safe/audit logic and router tests passed.
Implementation
- Renamed the seven model files and exports to:
models.SafeRulemodels.SafeEventmodels.SafeEventDisposalmodels.SafeInspectionmodels.AuditApprovalmodels.AuditExportLogmodels.AuditOperationLog
- Updated model comments while preserving the Chinese model and field descriptions.
- Updated migration registrations and
TableName()values tosafe_rule,safe_event,safe_event_disposal,safe_inspection,audit_approval,audit_export_log, andaudit_operation_log. - Renamed the disposal relation field, GORM column, JSON field, queries, and SQL
expectations to
safe_event_identity. - Renamed the safety and audit resource catalogue entries and protected routes, including the append-only safe-event disposal endpoints and the audit approval action.
- Updated the audit workflow to persist to the renamed audit tables and record
audit_approvalas its object type. - Updated dashboard and resource behavior tests for the renamed tables and models.
No legacy aliases were retained. No table/data migration was added.
Verification
From backend/api:
go test ./...
Result: exit code 0; all Go packages passed.
go build ./cmd/main
Result: exit code 0.
Production-only searches found no legacy model exports, saf_/aud_ tokens, or
legacy model filenames under backend/api. Negative assertions in backend tests
intentionally retain the old public paths so regressions cannot reintroduce
aliases.
From frontend/platform_admin:
node --test scripts/audit-check.test.mjs
Result: expected exit code 1, with 6 passing and 1 failing test. The remaining failure is the Task 1 frontend rename contract assigned to Task 3. No frontend file was modified by this task.
git diff --check completed without whitespace errors.
Concerns
- Deploying this backend before Task 3 would leave the current frontend calling the removed legacy resource paths. The coordinated frontend rename must ship with the backend contract change.
- Historical
saf_*andaud_*tables/data are intentionally not migrated or aliased, per the task constraint.